On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 12:05:35PM +0200, 'Wolfram Sang' wrote: > > > Yes, other patches will build even without this patch. But SFP will not work. > > This patch series implement I2C, GPIO, SFP and PHYLINK. The support of SFP > > is dependent on I2C and GPIO. If these patches will be end up merging in the > > same upstream version, it's not a problem to merge them in different trees, > > I think. > > That's how I saw it as well. > > Applied to for-next, thanks! Be careful... net-next uses patchwork, and I suspect as this is posted as a series which the subject line states as being destined by the author for the "net-next" tree, the entire series will end up being slurped into the net-next tree. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.10/networking/netdev-FAQ.html#q-how-do-i-indicate-which-tree-net-vs-net-next-my-patch-should-be-in This patch is still marked as "new" in patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230605025211.743823-3-jiawenwu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!