On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 12:05 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:51:05AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:54 PM Slater, Joseph > > <joe.slater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > [Slater, Joseph] I'll get rid of the comment and try the test with a shorter toggle time. > > > The series of 159 tests takes, maybe, 10-15 minutes for me, so I don't think saving a > > > second or two here would make much difference, though. > > > Joe > > > > > > > That can't be right, are you running it on a toaster? It takes 26 > > seconds on my regular lenovo thinkpad laptop which is still longer > > than I'd like but quite acceptable for now (though I agree it would be > > great to improve it). > > > > Consider yourself blessed. > I just got: > > real 2m25.956s > > on my test VM. > Not sure exactly what the hold up is - it isn't using much CPU, or any > other resources AFAICT. > Compared to all the other test suites I run, this is far and away the > slowest, especially since switching everything over to gpio-sim. I agree it's too slow - be it 20 seconds or 2 minutes. But similarly to you - it's very low on my TODO list as I only run it every once in a while. I'd be happy to accept any patches improving the situation of course. Bart