On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 10:38:30AM +0200, Alexandre TORGUE wrote: > Hi Conor > > On 5/29/23 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 06:20:25PM +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote: > > > Add stm32mp257 pinctrl support. > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.h b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.h > > > index e0c31c4c8bca..5e5de92ddd58 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.h > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.h > > > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ > > > #define STM32MP_PKG_AB BIT(1) > > > #define STM32MP_PKG_AC BIT(2) > > > #define STM32MP_PKG_AD BIT(3) > > > +#define STM32MP_PKG_AI BIT(8) > > > +#define STM32MP_PKG_AK BIT(10) > > > +#define STM32MP_PKG_AL BIT(11) > > > > Mainly out of curiosity, why have you go duplicate defines for these? > > Mainly to fit with available packages for various STM32 MPU. Currently MP1 > SoCs are available with packages AB/AC/AD and MP2 series with AI/AK/AL but > in the future we could have package AB/AC/AD/AI available for a particular > SoC and then I need to anticipate this case. Sorry, what I meant was "why have you got defines for these in this header, when there is an existing set in include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32-pinfunc.h?". Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature