On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 10:26:01AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > On Mon, 29 May 2023 15:16:47 +0100 > Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hey Hugo, > > > > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 10:07:08AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Some variants in this series of UART controllers have GPIO pins that > > > are shared between GPIO and modem control lines. > > > > > > The pin mux mode (GPIO or modem control lines) can be set for each > > > ports (channels) supported by the variant. > > > > > > This adds a property to the device tree to set the GPIO pin mux to > > > modem control lines on selected ports if needed. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Did I not ack this in v2? I didn't notice a reason for dropping it > > in the cover etc. Was it intentionally dropped, or missed? > In v3, I slighly modified the example, and that is why I didn't copy your ack. Ah, I would say that for "slight modifications" when you have an ack, you could keep it - but everyone is different and dropping tags is likely to piss people off less than keeping them, so I understand sticking on the safe side.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
