I just realized that we are discussing all this without GPIO maintainers to be involved! Cc'ed to Linus and Bart for their valuable opinions / comments. (TL;DR: GPIO regmap seems need some fixes) On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 2:07 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:57 PM Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Anyway it is a bit complicated, could I use this version of GPIO implementation if > > > > it's really tough? > > > > > > It's possible but from GPIO subsystem point of view it's discouraged > > > as long as there is no technical impediment to go the regmap way. > > > > After these days of trying, I guess there are still some bugs on gpio - regmap - irq. > > It looks like an compatibility issue with gpio_irq_chip and regmap_irq_chip (My rough > > fixes seems to work). > > > > Other than that, it seems to be no way to add interrupt trigger in regmap_irq_thread(), > > to solve the both-edge problem for my hardware. > > > > I'd be willing to use gpio-regmap if above issues worked out, I learned IRQ controller, > > IRQ domain, etc. , after all. > > And thank you for all this! > Now you may suggest the fixes to the GPIO regmap with all your > knowledge of the area. > > > But if not, I'd like to implement GPIO in the original way, > > it was tested to work. May I? Thanks for all your suggestions. > > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko