Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] pinctrl: tps6594: Add driver for TPS6594 pinctrl and GPIOs

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:26 PM Esteban Blanc <eblanc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed May 17, 2023 at 5:04 PM CEST, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 5:43 PM Esteban Blanc <eblanc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

> > Don't get me wrong, it's possible to have, but since it's unusual it
> > needs to be well justified. In the change you proposed you have
> > changed that, but I haven't seen where the new definition is used  (in
> > *.c files).
>
> Actualy it used in 2 places:
> - In the switch case of `tps6594_gpio_regmap_xlate`
> - In `tps6594_pinctrl_probe` when setting `reg_dir_out_base`
>
> I already sent a v5 with this change but I managed to fail my .config
> and this driver was not compiled... and it is not compiling... I feel so
> stupid.

People are prone to making mistakes. :-)

> I need to send a v6 now anyway. Should I convert all
> TPS6594_REG_GPIO1_CONF to TPS6594_REG_GPIOX_CONF(0)?

Again, if you want to leave that definition you need to well justify
why it's so special that code needs it. Easiest way is to use the
macro with 0 as an argument.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko