On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 6:28 AM Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Calling gpiod_to_irq() creates an irq_desc for the GPIO. Normally gpiod_to_irq() should not have side effects, it's just a helper function that is there to translate a descriptor to the corresponding IRQ number. > This is not > something that should happen when just exporting the GPIO via sysfs. The > effect of this was observed as triggering a warning in > gpiochip_disable_irq() when kexec()ing after exporting a GPIO. > > Remove the call to gpiod_to_irq() from gpio_is_visible(). The actual > intended creation of the irq_desc comes via edge_store() when requested > by the user. > > Fixes: ebbeba120ab2 ("gpio: sysfs: fix gpio attribute-creation race") > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I have a hard time understanding this fix. The problem is rather this see gpiolib.c: int gpiod_to_irq(const struct gpio_desc *desc) { struct gpio_chip *gc; int offset; /* * Cannot VALIDATE_DESC() here as gpiod_to_irq() consumer semantics * requires this function to not return zero on an invalid descriptor * but rather a negative error number. */ if (!desc || IS_ERR(desc) || !desc->gdev || !desc->gdev->chip) return -EINVAL; gc = desc->gdev->chip; offset = gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc); if (gc->to_irq) { int retirq = gc->to_irq(gc, offset); Here gc->to_irq() is called unconditionally. Since this is using gpiolib_irqchip this ->to_irq() will be gpiochip_to_irq() and that finally ends in the call: return irq_create_mapping(domain, offset); which seems to be the problem here. Why is this a problem? The IRQ mappings are dynamic, meaning they are created on-demand, but for this hardware it should be fine to essentially just call irq_create_mapping() on all of them as the device is created, we just don't do it in order to save space. I don't understand why calling irq_create_mapping(domain, offset); creates a problem? It's just a mapping between a GPIO and the corresponding IRQ. What am I missing here? Yours, Linus Walleij