Re: [BISECTED REGRESSION] OMAP1 GPIO breakage

[Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

* Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [230504 12:45]:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 4 May 2023 14:13:32 +0200
> Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 7:52 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [230426 07:20]:  
> > > > Seems that we should just revert this patch for now and try again after
> > > > the issues have been fixed.  
> > >
> > > Looking at the proposed fixes being posted seems like they are quite
> > > intrusive.. How about we partially revert this patch so omap1 still
> > > uses static assigment of gpios?  
> > 
> > I think Andreas patch (commit 92bf78b33b0b463b00c6b0203b49aea845daecc8)
> > kind of describes the problem with that: the probe order is now unpredictable,
> > so if we revert the patch then that problem returns, but I don't know how
> > serious that problem is.
> > 
> well, I think we can even fully revert 92bf78b33b0b463b00c6b0203b49aea845daecc8
> after my patch
> 
> gpiolib: fix allocation of mixed dynamic/static GPIOs
> 
> is in as a short time solution. That should only leave unpredictable
> numbers of multiple dynamic gpio controllers.

OK thanks sounds good to me.

Regards,

Tony