Hi Andy, On 2023-04-06 at 13:26:36 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 12:15 PM Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Christophe Leroy and gpio experts, > > > > Greeting! > > > > Platform: Tigerlake-H and so on x86 platforms > > > > All detailed info is in link: https://github.com/xupengfe/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/issue_bisect/230406_gpio-mockup_kselftest_failed_bisect_v63rc5 > > Bisect info: https://github.com/xupengfe/syzkaller_logs/blob/main/issue_bisect/230406_gpio-mockup_kselftest_failed_bisect_v63rc5/bisect_info.txt > > > > gpio-mockup.sh kslef-test failed in v6.3-rc5 kernel. > > gpio-mockup.sh(gpio overflow test) in kself-test could reproduce this issue: > > cd linux/tools/testing/selftests > > 1. ./kselftest_install.sh > > 2. cd linux/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_install/gpio > > # ./gpio-mockup.sh > > 1. Module load tests > > 1.1. dynamic allocation of gpio > > 2. Module load error tests > > 2.1 gpio overflow > > test failed: unexpected chip - gpiochip1 > > GPIO gpio-mockup test FAIL > > > > And the simplified steps to reproduce this issue are as follow: > > " > > # Load gpio_mockup with overflow ranges -1,1024: > > modprobe -q gpio_mockup gpio_mockup_ranges="-1,1024" > > > > # Check is there some Call Trace generated in dmesg > > dmesg | grep -C 5 Call > > > > # Should not generate any gpiochip folder like /sys/kernel/debug/gpio-mockup/gpiochip1 > > # Because load gpio_mockup with overflow ranges -1,1024 > > find "/sys/kernel/debug/gpio-mockup/" -name gpiochip* -type d | sort > > > > # Unload the gpio_mockup module > > modprobe -r gpio_mockup > > # Check is there "Call Trace" generated in dmesg > > dmesg | grep -C 5 Call > > " > > > > Actually the judgement "gpio-mockup.sh" test/bisect judgement point is that: > > Should not generate any gpiochip folder like > > /sys/kernel/debug/gpio-mockup/gpiochip1 after load gpio_mockup with overflow > > ranges -1,1024. > > > > I met gpio-mockup.sh test failed but there is no any "Call Trace" dmesg info > > sometimes. > > > > So the shortest check steps are as follow: > > " > > 1. modprobe -q gpio_mockup gpio_mockup_ranges="-1,1024" > > After above gpio_mockup module loaded with overflow range "-1,1024": > > Correct behavior as previous v6.1 or older kernel:"gpio should not load "gpiochip1" due to overflow range -1,1024"; > > Wrong behavior in v6.3-rc5 kernel: "gpio *load* "gpiochip1" with overflow range -1,1024 and "gpiochip1" should not be loaded". > > The underlying problem was already buried here. > > > > 2. Could use below command to check if "gpiochip1" generated: > > As before v6.1, there was no "/sys/kernel/debug/gpio-mockup/gpiochip1" sysfs folder due to overflow range -1,1024"; > > Wrong behavior in v6.3-rc5 kernel: "/sys/kernel/debug/gpio-mockup/gpiochip1" sysfs folder generated as follow command check: > > # find "/sys/kernel/debug/gpio-mockup/" -name gpiochip* -type d | sort > > /sys/kernel/debug/gpio-mockup/gpiochip1 > > If there is gpiochip* generated, gpio-mockup.sh kself-test would be failed also. > > " > > > > Bisected and found the bad commit was: > > " > > 7b61212f2a07a5afd213c8876e52b5c9946441e2 > > gpiolib: Get rid of ARCH_NR_GPIOS > > " > > And after reverted the above commit on top of v6.3-rc5 kernel, above > > gpio-mockup.sh kself-test could pass and this issue was gone. > > > > Now gpio-mockup.sh kself-test is failed on almost all x86 platform from > > v6.2 cycle mainline kernel. > > > > I hope above info is helpful to solve the "gpio-mockup.sh kself-test failed" > > problem. > > Thank you for the report and full analysis of the root cause. I think > we may fix the test script however the gpio-mockup is obsoleted and > should be actually replaced with tests again gpio-sim. > Thanks for your info! So we should ignore the gpio-mockup module related test next time and the gpio-mockup kself-test is not necessary. My colleague "Lai Yi" also found this issue. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZCvusEIauvO8BLM5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ If there is a patch update please add: "Reported-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@xxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: Yi Lai <yi1.lai@xxxxxxxxx> " Thanks! BR. -Pengfei > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko