RE: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: update gpio-ranges

[Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2023年3月28日 22:48
> To: Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx; brgl@xxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx;
> s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; festevam@xxxxxxxxx;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; stefan@xxxxxxxx; linux-
> gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Peng Fan
> <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: update gpio-ranges
> 
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 01:29:12PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > 1 is not enough for i.MX9, enlarge it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml | 3 ++-
> 
> I'm not that knowledgeable about i.MX9, but i thought vf610 was Vybrid,
> which is not an i.MX9. Does i.MX9 reuse the Vybrid GPIO controller? Is this
> change also valid for the Vybrid?
[Peng Fan] 

i.MX9 reuse the gpio-vf610 driver and yaml dtschema. There are some
minor differences from hardware level. The gpio-ranges will also impact
vybrid, but this may not matter.

Regards,
Peng.
> 
> 	Andrew