Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] pinctrl: s32: separate const device data from struct s32_pinctrl_soc_info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:49 PM Chester Lin <clin@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The .data field in struct of_device_id is used as a const member so it's
> inappropriate to attach struct s32_pinctrl_soc_info with of_device_id
> because some members in s32_pinctrl_soc_info need to be filled by
> pinctrl-s32cc at runtime.
>
> For this reason, struct s32_pinctrl_soc_info must be allocated in
> pinctrl-s32cc and then create a new struct s32_pinctrl_soc_data in order
> to represent const .data in of_device_id. To combine these two structures,
> a s32_pinctrl_soc_data pointer is introduced in s32_pinctrl_soc_info.

So, the first patch has to be embedded in this one, correct?
Don't forget to compile and test your contributions beforehand.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux