Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] dt-bindings: gpio: add NPCM sgpio driver bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/03/2023 19:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> +examples:
>> +  - |
>> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/nuvoton,npcm7xx-clock.h>
>> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> +    gpio8: gpio@101000 {
>> +        compatible = "nuvoton,npcm750-sgpio";
>> +        reg = <0x101000 0x200>;
>> +        clocks = <&clk NPCM7XX_CLK_APB3>;
>> +        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 19 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +        gpio-controller;
>> +        #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> +        nuvoton,input-ngpios = <64>;
>> +        nuvoton,output-ngpios = <64>;
>> +        status = "disabled";
> 
> So this is fifth reminder...
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/d56c24c2-a017-8468-0b3a-bd93d6024c69@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/39efdb85-f881-12ab-e258-61175f209b4c@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/9fc4d874-a0d0-6c5c-aeee-61ab817fdd9f@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> This is a not-that-friendly-anymore reminder during the review process.
> 
> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
> requested changes or keep discussing them.

BTW, you never responded that my comment is unclear, but I can imagine
that this was the cause of some misunderstanding. Therefore just in case
let's be clear: drop the "status line". Entire line.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux