On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 7:57 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > IRQ framework provides special type and getter to transform > the Linux IRQ to the hardware pin. Use that type and getter > function instead of direct access. > > While at it, amend an indentation in a couple of places. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> This is more elegant, so Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Use IRQ hardware number getter instead of direct access
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Use IRQ hardware number getter instead of direct access
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:27:24 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20230309185819.85050-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20230309185819.85050-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Use IRQ hardware number getter instead of direct access
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Use IRQ hardware number getter instead of direct access
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: qcom: sm8550-lpass-lpi: allow GPIO function
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Get rid of devprop prefix in one function
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Use IRQ hardware number getter instead of direct access
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Use IRQ hardware number getter instead of direct access
- Index(es):
 |