Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] regmap-irq: Add no_status support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 11:11:26AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 5:54 PM William Breathitt Gray
> <william.gray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Some devices lack status registers, yet expect to handle interrupts.
> > Introduce a no_status flag to indicate such a configuration, where
> > rather than read a status register to verify, all interrupts received
> > are assumed to be active.
> >
> > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@xxxxxxxxxx>

[...]

> Mark,
> 
> If this looks good to you, could you Ack it so that I can take it
> through the GPIO tree?
> 
> Bart

Bart,

There's a change to the regmap-irq handle_mask_sync() callback I
submitted that will affect these patches [0]. If you haven't already
picked up this series, I suggest waiting until the handle_mask_sync()
change is resolved, after which I can rebase this series on top of it
and we'll end up with a cleaner git history.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230309232009.2938-1-william.gray@xxxxxxxxxx/

William Breathitt Gray

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux