Re: [PATCH 19/20] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek: mt7620: split binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9.03.2023 12:54, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 03/03/2023 01:28, arinc9.unal@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx>

The MT7628 and MT7688 SoCs contain different pin muxing information,
therefore, should be split. This can be done now that there are compatible
strings to distinguish them from other SoCs.

Split the schema out to mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl.yaml.

Remove mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl from mt7620.

Deprecate ralink,mt7620-pinctrl. The reason is, the DTs for mt76x8 which
use this string will incorrectly match the pin muxing information for
mt7620. There's a new string, mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl, which makes the
deprecation possible.

Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml      | 380 +--------------
  .../pinctrl/mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl.yaml      | 450 ++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 459 insertions(+), 371 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml
index 11530b29d52b..38b71c74b9a0 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -11,16 +11,13 @@ maintainers:
    - Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx>
description: |
-  MediaTek MT7620 pin controller for MT7620, MT7628 and MT7688 SoCs.
+  MediaTek MT7620 pin controller for MT7620 SoC.
    The pin controller can only set the muxing of pin groups. Muxing individual
    pins is not supported. There is no pinconf support.
properties:
    compatible:
-    enum:
-      - mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl
-      - mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl
-      - ralink,mt7620-pinctrl

I see removal, not deprecation.

I thought deprecation meant removing a string with explanation on the patch log, as I remember from my conversation with you and Rob on this patch series.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/87c9bf7e-f290-7d38-0844-7a7243688f5a@xxxxxxxxxx/

I won't have to deprecate this now that we straightened things out but I'd like to know the proper way to deprecate compatible strings regardless.

Arınç



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux