[PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: use consistent name for "group" variable

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>]

The set_mux callback in SoC TLMM driver (pinctrl-msm.c) uses "group",
not "group_num" for the number of the pin group.  Other places of
lpass-lpi also use "group", so let's be consistent for code readability.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
index 27fc8b671954..bd32556d75a5 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
@@ -84,10 +84,10 @@ static int lpi_gpio_get_function_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 }
 
 static int lpi_gpio_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int function,
-			    unsigned int group_num)
+			    unsigned int group)
 {
 	struct lpi_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
-	const struct lpi_pingroup *g = &pctrl->data->groups[group_num];
+	const struct lpi_pingroup *g = &pctrl->data->groups[group];
 	u32 val;
 	int i, pin = g->pin;
 
-- 
2.34.1