Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] gpio: Add support for Intel LJCA USB GPIO driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 09.03.23 08:10, Ye Xiang wrote:

+#define LJCA_GPIO_BUF_SIZE 60
+struct ljca_gpio_dev {
+	struct platform_device *pdev;
+	struct gpio_chip gc;
+	struct ljca_gpio_info *gpio_info;
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(unmasked_irqs, LJCA_MAX_GPIO_NUM);
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(enabled_irqs, LJCA_MAX_GPIO_NUM);
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(reenable_irqs, LJCA_MAX_GPIO_NUM);
+	u8 *connect_mode;
+	/* mutex to protect irq bus */
+	struct mutex irq_lock;
+	struct work_struct work;
+	/* lock to protect package transfer to Hardware */
+	struct mutex trans_lock;
+
+	u8 obuf[LJCA_GPIO_BUF_SIZE];
+	u8 ibuf[LJCA_GPIO_BUF_SIZE];

And here we have a violation of DMA coherency rules.
Basically you cannot embed buffers into other data structures
if they can be subject to DMA.




+static int ljca_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct ljca_gpio_dev *ljca_gpio = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	gpiochip_remove(&ljca_gpio->gc);
+	ljca_unregister_event_cb(ljca_gpio->gpio_info->ljca);
+	mutex_destroy(&ljca_gpio->irq_lock);
+	mutex_destroy(&ljca_gpio->trans_lock);

At this time, what has made sure that no work is scheduled?

+	return 0;
+}

	Regards
		Oliver




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux