On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 4:52 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The description of second IO address is a bit confusing. It is supposed > to be the MCC range which contains the slew rate registers, not the slew > rate register base. The Linux driver then accesses slew rate register > with hard-coded offset (0xa000). > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> LGTM, is this something I should just apply or will you collect a larger series of Qcom DT patches this time around as well? Yours, Linus Walleij