On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 4:49 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To help gpiolib not fiddle around with the internals of the irqchip > flag the chip as immutable, adding the calls into the gpiolib core > required to do so. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> 1) I'm impressed that you're using AT91 hardware 2) Can you respin this on top of my pinctrl devel branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=devel There are some Andy-cleanups already queued for AT91 so I am a bit worried of collisions. (If you feel confident they are orthogonal just use v6.3-rc1) Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: Make the irqchip immutable
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: Make the irqchip immutable
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 14:20:56 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20230216-gpio-at91-immutable-v1-1-44f52f148ab9@kernel.org>
- References: <20230216-gpio-at91-immutable-v1-0-44f52f148ab9@kernel.org> <20230216-gpio-at91-immutable-v1-1-44f52f148ab9@kernel.org>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: Make the irqchip immutable
- From: Nicolas Ferre
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: Make the irqchip immutable
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: Make the irqchip immutable
- References:
- [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: at91: Minor cleanups
- From: Mark Brown
- [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: Make the irqchip immutable
- From: Mark Brown
- [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: at91: Minor cleanups
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] dt-bindings: gpio: rockchip,gpio-bank: add unique hardware GPIO ID
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: mediatek: add missing options to PINCTRL_MT7981
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: Make the irqchip immutable
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: Make the irqchip immutable
- Index(es):
 |