On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 22:06:45 -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Provide more guidance to differentiate between recommendations for names of > lines which are hard-wired to on-board devices, versus recommendations for > names of lines which are connected to general-purpose pin headers. > > Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 41 +++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio.txt: expand gpio-line-names recommendations
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio.txt: expand gpio-line-names recommendations
- From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:51:37 -0600
- In-reply-to: <20230211030646.24549-1-twoerner@gmail.com>
- References: <20230211030646.24549-1-twoerner@gmail.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio.txt: expand gpio-line-names recommendations
- From: Trevor Woerner
- [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio.txt: expand gpio-line-names recommendations
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: gpio: rockchip,gpio-bank: add compatible string per SoC
- Next by Date: [PATCH] gpio: 104-dio-48e: Utilize mask_buf_def in handle_mask_sync() callback
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio.txt: expand gpio-line-names recommendations
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio.txt: expand gpio-line-names recommendations
- Index(es):
 |