On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 2:59 PM Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips: > > "not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!" > > Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new > helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions. Thanks for an update, something to amend below, otherwise Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Thanks Andy for the feedback! > > Changes in v2: > * Add missing calls to gpiochip_disable_irq() and gpiochip_enable_irq() > > drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c > index a429176673e7..b657a07a9b56 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c > @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ struct fsl_gpio_soc_data { > > struct vf610_gpio_port { > struct gpio_chip gc; > - struct irq_chip ic; > void __iomem *base; > void __iomem *gpio_base; > const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data *sdata; > @@ -207,19 +206,23 @@ static int vf610_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type) > > static void vf610_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d) > { > - struct vf610_gpio_port *port = > - gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d)); > + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > + struct vf610_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc); > void __iomem *pcr_base = port->base + PORT_PCR(d->hwirq); Now you can use gpio_num here... > + irq_hw_number_t gpio_num = irqd_to_hwirq(d); > > vf610_gpio_writel(0, pcr_base); > + gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, gpio_num); > } > > static void vf610_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d) > { > - struct vf610_gpio_port *port = > - gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d)); > + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > + struct vf610_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc); > void __iomem *pcr_base = port->base + PORT_PCR(d->hwirq); > + irq_hw_number_t gpio_num = irqd_to_hwirq(d); > > + gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, gpio_num); > vf610_gpio_writel(port->irqc[d->hwirq] << PORT_PCR_IRQC_OFFSET, ...and here. > pcr_base); > } > @@ -237,6 +240,17 @@ static int vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, u32 enable) > return 0; > } > > +static const struct irq_chip vf610_irqchip = { > + .name = "gpio-vf610", > + .irq_ack = vf610_gpio_irq_ack, > + .irq_mask = vf610_gpio_irq_mask, > + .irq_unmask = vf610_gpio_irq_unmask, > + .irq_set_type = vf610_gpio_irq_set_type, > + .irq_set_wake = vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake, > + .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, > + GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS, > +}; > + > static void vf610_gpio_disable_clk(void *data) > { > clk_disable_unprepare(data); > @@ -249,7 +263,6 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct vf610_gpio_port *port; > struct gpio_chip *gc; > struct gpio_irq_chip *girq; > - struct irq_chip *ic; > int i; > int ret; > > @@ -315,14 +328,6 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > gc->direction_output = vf610_gpio_direction_output; > gc->set = vf610_gpio_set; > > - ic = &port->ic; > - ic->name = "gpio-vf610"; > - ic->irq_ack = vf610_gpio_irq_ack; > - ic->irq_mask = vf610_gpio_irq_mask; > - ic->irq_unmask = vf610_gpio_irq_unmask; > - ic->irq_set_type = vf610_gpio_irq_set_type; > - ic->irq_set_wake = vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake; > - > /* Mask all GPIO interrupts */ > for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++) > vf610_gpio_writel(0, port->base + PORT_PCR(i)); > @@ -331,7 +336,7 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > vf610_gpio_writel(~0, port->base + PORT_ISFR); > > girq = &gc->irq; > - girq->chip = ic; > + gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &vf610_irqchip); > girq->parent_handler = vf610_gpio_irq_handler; > girq->num_parents = 1; > girq->parents = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, 1, > -- > 2.34.1 > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko