[PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: sim: Use %pfwP specifier instead of calling fwnode API directly

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Instead of calling fwnode_get_name() and supply as %s, use %pfwP which
will do the same inside printf() call.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
index 60514bc5454f..a51b5ea38ad5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
@@ -377,8 +377,8 @@ static int gpio_sim_add_bank(struct fwnode_handle *swnode, struct device *dev)
 
 	ret = fwnode_property_read_string(swnode, "gpio-sim,label", &label);
 	if (ret) {
-		label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s",
-				       dev_name(dev), fwnode_get_name(swnode));
+		label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%pfwP",
+				       dev_name(dev), swnode);
 		if (!label)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 	}
@@ -784,10 +784,9 @@ static int gpio_sim_add_hogs(struct gpio_sim_device *dev)
 							  GFP_KERNEL);
 			else
 				hog->chip_label = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
-							"gpio-sim.%u-%s",
+							"gpio-sim.%u-%pfwP",
 							dev->id,
-							fwnode_get_name(
-								bank->swnode));
+							bank->swnode);
 			if (!hog->chip_label) {
 				gpio_sim_remove_hogs(dev);
 				return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.39.1