On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 3:31 AM Hal Feng <hal.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have resent the patches rebased on your "devel" branch. Rob has added > Reviewed-by tags for DT bindings, but the DT binding patches still need > to be modified a little bit. Could you apply this series if I modify the > DT bindings patches and resend as v5? Or it need another round of review? No more review needed for small fixes. Just resend a v5 and include the review tags and I will apply it. After a few revisions this is usually fine. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Basic pinctrl support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Basic pinctrl support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 11:34:37 +0100
- In-reply-to: <87e31545-3107-1cc2-fc93-197f66712ccc@starfivetech.com>
- References: <20230203141801.59083-1-hal.feng@starfivetech.com> <87e31545-3107-1cc2-fc93-197f66712ccc@starfivetech.com>
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: I2c GPIO Recovery with pinctrl strict mode
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 14/18] gpio: regmap: Add missing header(s)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Basic pinctrl support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC
- Next by thread: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi: correct GPIO name pattern
- Index(es):
 |