Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: tegra: Add Tegra234 pinmux device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/02/2023 13:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> I wonder if there's a good way to detect these. We'd have to run checks
>> on the DT source files, so that's a bit difficult. I do have an
>> experimental script that tries to capture some common pitfalls on
>> sources but it's quite ugly and slow, but I guess I could add something
>> like this. But perhaps there are better ways?
> 
> One way to easy spot them is to override always by label, thus every
> node defined like above is a new node. However I think we talked about
> this and you do not follow this practice, thus there is no way to tell -
> is the status reasonable or not.
> 
> Automated tools could help here as well - run fdtdump on DTB and look
> for status=okay.

Eh, obviously it won't work - every node which was disabled in DTSI and
enabled in DTS will have the status=okay...

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux