On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 2:29 PM Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Use devm_kasprintf() instead of kasprintf() to avoid any potential > leaks. At the moment drivers have no remove functionality thus > there is no need for fixes tag. > > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied! Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: use devm_kasprintf() to avoid potential leaks
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: use devm_kasprintf() to avoid potential leaks
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 12:12:17 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20230203132714.1931596-1-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
- References: <20230203132714.1931596-1-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: use devm_kasprintf() to avoid potential leaks
- From: Claudiu Beznea
- [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: use devm_kasprintf() to avoid potential leaks
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH V6 4/7] pinctrl: qcom: Add IPQ9574 pinctrl driver
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: sm8450-lpass-lpi: correct swr_rx_data group
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: use devm_kasprintf() to avoid potential leaks
- Next by thread: [PATCH v4 0/4] Basic pinctrl support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC
- Index(es):
 |