Re: [PATCH] mmc: atmel: convert to gpio descriptos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 27, 2023, at 11:32, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On 26/01/2023 at 14:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> All Atmel (now Microchip) machines boot using DT, so the
>> old platform_data for this driver is no longer used by any
>> boards.
>> 
>> Removing the pdata probe lets us simplify the GPIO handling
>> with the use of the descriptor API.
>
> Thanks for your patch. I would like to know if it's related to the 
> initiative started by Bala in this series:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221226073908.17317-1-balamanikandan.gunasundar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> It's true that it didn't come to a conclusion yet...

I hadn't seen that one, my patch was a somewhat older series to
convert a couple of subsystems over from the old of_get_named_gpio(),
with no special interest in this platform.

It looks like the patches are fairly similar, with two differences
I can see immediately:

- I use the normal devm_gpiod_get_optional(), while Bala uses
  the fwnode variant that should not be needed here since the
  fwnode is the one for the platform device itself.
- I use the normal gpiod_get_value(), which will handle polarity
  as specified in DT, while Bala's patch uses gpiod_get_raw_value().
  The difference is what happens when the GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag
  is set in the DT, and the possible combinations with the
  "cd-inverted" flag. I did not test my version, so I assume
  Bala is correct here, but it would be good to review this
  carefully either way.

     Arnd



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux