On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:53 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The ->of_gpio_ranges_fallback() repeats the idea that lies behind > ->add_pin_ranges(), while the latter covers more cases that the former > hook. Drop the former one for good. > > Changelog v3: > - moved check of the property presense to GPIO library > - split out the refcount fix in a separate patch > - added cover letter Patches applied! Sorry for taking almost 2 weeks :/ Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] gpiolib: get rid of exessive ->of_gpio_ranges_fallback()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] gpiolib: get rid of exessive ->of_gpio_ranges_fallback()
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 13:39:59 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20230113215352.44272-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20230113215352.44272-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v3 0/4] gpiolib: get rid of exessive ->of_gpio_ranges_fallback()
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v3 0/4] gpiolib: get rid of exessive ->of_gpio_ranges_fallback()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] gpio: Clean up headers
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: qcom: Unify accessing to device fwnode
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] gpiolib: get rid of exessive ->of_gpio_ranges_fallback()
- Next by thread: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: qcom: Unify accessing to device fwnode
- Index(es):
 |