On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 1:42 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There are many pin control drivers define their own data type for > pin function representation which is the same or embed the same data > as newly introduced one. Provide the data type and convenient macro > for all pin control drivers. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Very nice and helpful! Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] pinctrl: Introduce struct pinfunction and PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION() macro
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] pinctrl: Introduce struct pinfunction and PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION() macro
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 22:17:37 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20221219124240.62781-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20221219124240.62781-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/8] pinctrl: Introduce struct pinfunction and PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION() macro
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/8] pinctrl: Introduce struct pinfunction and PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION() macro
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 6.2 regression fix] gpiolib: Fix using uninitialized lookup-flags on ACPI platforms
- Next by Date: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 0/3] gpiolib: eventual of_node retirement
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] pinctrl: Introduce struct pinfunction and PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION() macro
- Next by thread: [PATCH 1/5] gpiolib: of: remove of_gpio_count()
- Index(es):
 |