Hello Andy, On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:32:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 07:14:44PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > I just tested compiling your series without patch #6, x86_64 allmodconfig + PWM=n. > > > > nm doesn't report the need for devm_pwm_lpss_probe in > > drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.o. > > Sounds like you are right. I tried a brief test with m/m, y/m, m/y, and m/n > variants between PINCTRL_INTEL and PWM_LPSS and all were built fine. > > That said, I will drop this patch and send a PR with the rest. Sounds good. > Thank you for thorough review! Thank you for the interesting thread. I like our conversations. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
