Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Unify access to the device properties

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 08:16:22PM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2022-11-16 16:17:28, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Some of the functions are using struct fwnode_handle, some struct device
> > pointer. In the GPIO library the firmware node of the GPIO device is the
> > same as GPIO node of the GPIO chip. Due to this fact we may use former
> > to access properties everywhere in the code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I presume this is a more complete version of [1], as this also happens
> to address the crash on MSM [1], hence:
> 
> Tested-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thank you!

> Just in case, this seems to depend on [3] or it fails to apply cleanly
> because of the `const` change on `fwnode` (consider this irrelevant if
> it has already been applied, I'm still on -next-20221115 for this
> integration branch).

But initial issue was induced by (my) patch which is only in gpio/for-next.
It's supposed to be only Linux Next issue.

> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y3S62i7OzocP5QrT@orome/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221115110800.35gl3j43lmbxm3jb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20221031-gpiolib-swnode-v3-0-0282162b0fa4@xxxxxxxxx/

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux