On 18/11/2022 16:19, Sander Vanheule wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2022-11-15 at 11:06 +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
This converts the Semtech SX150Xq bindings to dt-schemas, add necessary
bindings documentation to cover all differences between HW variants
and current bindings usage.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Changes in v3:
- Resent with missing To: Linus Walleij
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221005-mdm9615-sx1509q-yaml-v2-0-a4a5b8eecc7b@xxxxxxxxxx
Changes in v2:
- fixed rob comments
- added rob's Reviewed-by
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221005-mdm9615-sx1509q-yaml-v1-0-0c26649b637c@xxxxxxxxxx
---
[snip]
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - semtech,sx1503q
+ - semtech,sx1506q
+ then:
+ patternProperties:
+ '-cfg$':
+ properties:
+ pins:
+ items:
+ pattern: '^gpio[0-15]$'
[snip]
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ const: semtech,sx1509q
+ then:
+ patternProperties:
+ '-cfg$':
+ properties:
+ pins:
+ items:
+ pattern: '^(oscio|gpio[0-15])$'
Sorry to be so late to reply, but don't these patterns only match "gpio0", "gpio1", and "gpio5"?
A quick search for some datasheets turned up the SX1503 and SX1509Q with 16 GPIOs, so I assume the
intention was to match "gpio0" to "gpio15". I think this should be "^(gpio[0-9]|gpio1[0-5])$" (or
something equivalent).
Damn you're right, Linus should I resend or send a fixup ?
Thanks,
Neil
Best,
Sander
