On 16/11/2022 11:11, Neil Armstrong wrote: > Document compatible for the pm8010 SPMI PMIC. > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx> I don't get why this is not part of previous. The previous patch already documents 5 different PMICs in this file. This should be squashed. Best regards, Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: document pm8010
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: document pm8010
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:16:02 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20221114-narmstrong-sm8550-upstream-spmi-v1-2-6338a2b4b241@linaro.org>
- References: <20221114-narmstrong-sm8550-upstream-spmi-v1-0-6338a2b4b241@linaro.org> <20221114-narmstrong-sm8550-upstream-spmi-v1-2-6338a2b4b241@linaro.org>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2
- References:
- [PATCH 0/7] qcom: add support for SPMI PMICs found on SM8550 platforms
- From: Neil Armstrong
- [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: document pm8010
- From: Neil Armstrong
- [PATCH 0/7] qcom: add support for SPMI PMICs found on SM8550 platforms
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: document pm8550, pm8550b, pm8550ve, pm8550vs & pmk8550
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC] gpiolib: ensure that fwnode is properly set
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: document pm8010
- Next by thread: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: document pm8550, pm8550b, pm8550ve, pm8550vs & pmk8550
- Index(es):
 |