On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 02:42:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 08:55:51PM -0500, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > > Provide a public callback handle_mask_sync() that drivers can use when > > they have more complex IRQ masking logic. The default implementation is > > regmap_irq_handle_mask_sync(), used if the chip doesn't provide its own > > callback. > > ... > > > + * @handle_mask_sync: Callback used to handle IRQ mask syncs. The index will be > > + * in the range [0, num_regs[ > > Not sure if it's a typo ([ vs. ]), but if you want to say "not including the > last", use mathematical notation, i.e. "[0, num_regs)". I was following the convention used in the @get_irq_reg description, but I agree that mathematical notation would be much clearer. William Breathitt Gray
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
