Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: Move for_each_maps() to namespace and hide iterator inside

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 5:08 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 05:57:24PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > First of all, while for_each_maps() is private to pin control subsystem
> > it's still better to have it put into a namespace.
> >
> > Besides that, users are not relying on iterator variable, so hide it
> > inside for-loop.
>
> ...
>
> > +#define for_each_pin_map(_maps_node_, _map_)                                         \
> > +     list_for_each_entry(_maps_node_, &pinctrl_maps, node)                           \
> > +             for (unsigned int __i = 0;                                              \
>
> > +                  _map_ = &_maps_node_->maps[__i], __i < _maps_node_->num_maps;      \
>
> Hmm... I think this is actually not okay, if we have maps be NULL and
> num_maps = 0, KABOOM is guaranteed.
>
> I will experiment and update this.

OK

> Meanwhile, Linus, do you think this change is useful?

Even if just a name change, it makes things better by being more
readable so yes :)

Yours,
Linus Walleij



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux