On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 05:07:05PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The callers never call the function with invalid pointer. > Moreover, compiler quite likely dropped that check anyway > because we use that pointer before the check. Please, ignore this series, it was wrong offset to send the patches from. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: of: Drop redundant check in of_mm_gpiochip_remove()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: of: Drop redundant check in of_mm_gpiochip_remove()
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 17:14:43 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20221109150706.38823-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20221109150706.38823-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: of: Drop redundant check in of_mm_gpiochip_remove()
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: of: Drop redundant check in of_mm_gpiochip_remove()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] gpiolib: Get rid of not used of_node member
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: of: Prepare of_mm_gpiochip_add_data() for fwnode
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] gpiolib: Get rid of not used of_node member
- Next by thread: [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: of: Prepare of_mm_gpiochip_add_data() for fwnode
- Index(es):
 |