Re: [GIT PULL] intel-pinctrl for 6.1-1

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 7:44 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 08:43:18PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 07:31:23PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 4:58 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > Can you send the GPIO changes separately? This way I don't need to
> > > pull all those pinctrl patches into the GPIO PR for the next merge
> > > window.
> >
> > Some of them, but not all, if that what you wish.
> > I.o.w. a couple of the GPIO changes must be part of pin control series.
>
> And I just realized that if any of new GPIO code will appear with the wrong
> headers, there will be an inconsistent state. That said, I prefer this PR is
> go as is.

Bart are you fine with pulling this as-is? (I am.)

Last merge window I pulled in a big I2C cleanup (remove to return void on
6 million drivers) and it was fine, my diffstat looked horrible but Torvalds
accepted it anyway I just mentioned it to him.

I think there is a way to shave off the irrelevant stuff from the diffstat,
and I think Andy even told me how to do this but can't find/remember the
git method used.

Yours,
Linus Walleij