Re: [PATCH -next] gpiolib: acpi: Use METHOD_NAME__AEI macro for acpi_walk_resources

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:51 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 03:23:27PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:48 AM Xiang Yang <xiangyang3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Using the METHOD_NAME__AEI macro instead of using "_AEI" directly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Xiang Yang <xiangyang3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> > > index a7d2358736fe..064ba5150fd4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> > > @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ void acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> > >         if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> > >                 return;
> > >
> > > -       acpi_walk_resources(handle, "_AEI",
> > > +       acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__AEI,
> > >                             acpi_gpiochip_alloc_event, acpi_gpio);
> >
> > This line dates back to 2018 so why -next in your PATCH tag?
>
> This means "for Linux next cycle". It has roots in the net subsystem where
> it's a requirement to mark each patch either net or net-next, because they
> have a huge traffic of patches.
>
> > That being said - patch applied (unless Andy wants to take it directly).
>
> I think I will take it. Care to provide your tag?
>

Just take it, I will back it out.

Bartosz