Hi Svyatoslav, On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 7:30 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Update the driver to use an immutable IRQ chip to fix this warning: > > "not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!" > > Preserve per-chip labels by adding an ->irq_print_chip() callback. > > Tested-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> # TF201 T30 > Tested-by: Robert Eckelmann <longnoserob@xxxxxxxxx> # TF101 T20 > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks for your patch! Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 6ebd28bd087127ab ("gpio: tegra: Convert to immutable irq chip") in next-20221018. noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx reports a build failure introduced by this commit on e.g. m68k-allmodconfig: drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c:616:48: error: 'tegra_gpio_irq_set_wake' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'tegra_gpio_irq_set_type'? > index e4fb4cb38a0f..6b469253fad8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c > @@ -598,10 +600,43 @@ static void tegra_gpio_irq_release_resources(struct irq_data *d) > tegra_gpio_enable(tgi, d->hwirq); > } > > +static void tegra_gpio_irq_print_chip(struct irq_data *d, struct seq_file *s) > +{ > + struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > + > + seq_printf(s, dev_name(chip->parent)); > +} > + > +static const struct irq_chip tegra_gpio_irq_chip = { > + .irq_shutdown = tegra_gpio_irq_shutdown, > + .irq_ack = tegra_gpio_irq_ack, > + .irq_mask = tegra_gpio_irq_mask, > + .irq_unmask = tegra_gpio_irq_unmask, > + .irq_set_type = tegra_gpio_irq_set_type, > + .irq_set_wake = pm_sleep_ptr(tegra_gpio_irq_set_wake), This is an unrelated change, breaking the build if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set: the function pointer argument of pm_sleep_ptr() is always referenced, so the function definition must not be protected by #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP. As tegra_gpio_{resume,suspend}() are also in that section, you probably want to convert the references to them to the new macros introduced by commit 1a3c7bb088266fa2 ("PM: core: Add new *_PM_OPS macros, deprecate old ones"), too. Or just revert this change for now. > + .irq_print_chip = tegra_gpio_irq_print_chip, > + .irq_request_resources = tegra_gpio_irq_request_resources, > + .irq_release_resources = tegra_gpio_irq_release_resources, > + .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, > +}; > + > +static const struct irq_chip tegra210_gpio_irq_chip = { > + .irq_shutdown = tegra_gpio_irq_shutdown, > + .irq_ack = tegra_gpio_irq_ack, > + .irq_mask = tegra_gpio_irq_mask, > + .irq_unmask = tegra_gpio_irq_unmask, > + .irq_set_affinity = tegra_gpio_irq_set_affinity, > + .irq_set_type = tegra_gpio_irq_set_type, > + .irq_set_wake = pm_sleep_ptr(tegra_gpio_irq_set_wake), > + .irq_print_chip = tegra_gpio_irq_print_chip, > + .irq_request_resources = tegra_gpio_irq_request_resources, > + .irq_release_resources = tegra_gpio_irq_release_resources, > + .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, > +}; > + > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS > > #include <linux/debugfs.h> > -#include <linux/seq_file.h> > > static int tegra_dbg_gpio_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused) > { > @@ -689,18 +724,6 @@ static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > tgi->gc.ngpio = tgi->bank_count * 32; > tgi->gc.parent = &pdev->dev; > > - tgi->ic.name = "GPIO"; > - tgi->ic.irq_ack = tegra_gpio_irq_ack; > - tgi->ic.irq_mask = tegra_gpio_irq_mask; > - tgi->ic.irq_unmask = tegra_gpio_irq_unmask; > - tgi->ic.irq_set_type = tegra_gpio_irq_set_type; > - tgi->ic.irq_shutdown = tegra_gpio_irq_shutdown; > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > - tgi->ic.irq_set_wake = tegra_gpio_irq_set_wake; > -#endif > - tgi->ic.irq_request_resources = tegra_gpio_irq_request_resources; > - tgi->ic.irq_release_resources = tegra_gpio_irq_release_resources; > - > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tgi); > > if (tgi->soc->debounce_supported) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds