Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: convert qcom,mdm9615-pinctrl.txt to dt-schema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 06:21:28PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 06/10/2022 14:27, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, 06 Oct 2022 09:57:58 +0000, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > Convert the MDM9515 pinctrl bindings to dt-schema.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >   .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,mdm9615-pinctrl.txt      | 161 ---------------------
> > >   .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,mdm9615-pinctrl.yaml     | 101 +++++++++++++
> > >   2 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > 
> > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> > following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> > incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
> > 
> > Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
> > This will change in the future.
> > 
> > Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/
> > 
> > 
> > pinctrl@800000: 'gpioext1_pins', 'gsbi3_pins', 'gsbi4_pins', 'gsbi5_i2c_pins', 'gsbi5_uart_pins', 'reset_out_pins', 'sdc_cd_pins' do not match any of the regexes: '-state$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> > 	arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615-wp8548-mangoh-green.dtb
> > 
> 
> Yes it's fixed in the next patch, should I move the fix before the bindings conversion ?

No, because I don't apply the dts patches. It's just informational and 
ignore if you already took care of it.

Rob



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux