On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Am Dienstag, 20. September 2022, 11:26:26 CEST schrieb Linus Walleij: > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 8:09 AM Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > These patch fixes to support acpi by: > > > 1. populate gpio platform before pinctrl to probe > > > 2. get gpiochip by finding from gpiochip list > > > 3. get match data by device api > > > > > > Jianqun Xu (2): > > > pinctrl: rockchip: find gpiochip by name from gpio module > > > pinctrl: rockchip: get match data by device_get_match_data > > > > These look OK to me but I would feel better if Heiko or Andy ACK:ed > > them so I give them a few more days to comment. > > Right now I'm actually quite confused as I seem to have a bunch > of pinctrl/gpio-acpi patchsets of varying lengths in my inbox. > > There is a "v2", a "v8", a 20-patchset without version. > It's all quite confusing. With the LKP complains on top of almost each series... That's why I stopped considering them seriously (like some RFC is going on) and no more reviewing. I can suggest the author to create a branch on a public tree and collect all series together (like topic branches that are merged one-by-one to the main topic branch) and start again. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko