On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:54 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It seems that cy8c95x0_set_mux() missed serialization of IO access.
> And its implementation looks half-baked. Add locking to the function.
>
> Fixes: e6cbbe42944d ("pinctrl: Add Cypress cy8c95x0 support")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
All three patches are straight-forward and elegant so I just applied
them.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] pinctrl: cy8c95x0: Lock register accesses in cy8c95x0_set_mux()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] pinctrl: cy8c95x0: Lock register accesses in cy8c95x0_set_mux()
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 11:22:50 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20220916205450.86278-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20220916205450.86278-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/3] pinctrl: cy8c95x0: Lock register accesses in cy8c95x0_set_mux()
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/3] pinctrl: cy8c95x0: Lock register accesses in cy8c95x0_set_mux()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -next] pinctrl: sunxi: sun50i-h5: Switch to use dev_err_probe() helper
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 0/2] rockchip pinctrl for acpi
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 3/3] pinctrl: cy8c95x0: Align function names in cy8c95x0_pmxops
- Next by thread: [PATCH -next v2 1/2] pinctrl: ocelot: add missing destroy_workqueue() in error path in ocelot_pinctrl_probe()
- Index(es):
 |