On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 11:38 PM Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There is no cyclic dependency between gpio_twl4030_probe() and > gpio_twl4030_remove(), so by moving the latter before the former the > forward declaration can be dropped. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Applied, thanks! Bart
Re: [PATCH] gpio: twl4030: Reorder functions which allows to drop a forward declaraion
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: twl4030: Reorder functions which allows to drop a forward declaraion
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:03:16 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20220917213729.341321-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
- References: <20220917213729.341321-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio: twl4030: Reorder functions which allows to drop a forward declaraion
- From: Uwe Kleine-König
- [PATCH] gpio: twl4030: Reorder functions which allows to drop a forward declaraion
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RESEND] gpiolib: make gpiochip_find_by_name to be common function
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.144-rc1 review
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: twl4030: Reorder functions which allows to drop a forward declaraion
- Next by thread: [PATCH 1/3] misc: microchip: pci1xxxx: Do not disable the pci device twice in gp_aux_bus_remove()
- Index(es):
 |