On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 9:11 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Of course we were not the first ones to think about it... :D > I'll read through it later. Was there any particular reason why this > never made its way into the kernel? Inability to drive through a DT binding that was acceptable for the DT binding maintainers. A good idea to get it passed I think would be to ask Rob (with some examples) how he thinks it should look and finalize the bindings before coding. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: TODO: add an item about GPIO safe-state
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: TODO: add an item about GPIO safe-state
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 15:12:28 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAMRc=Me+srb_rwwaUxx1a=8+Wqm5sc2APzfCoFG3+QxRK5kEKA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20220914151145.73253-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <CACRpkdZaSL_pkmrVGOT-y7+3i4y6f6Cjgehycq2FKLwPxrbFvw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMRc=Me+srb_rwwaUxx1a=8+Wqm5sc2APzfCoFG3+QxRK5kEKA@mail.gmail.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: TODO: add an item about GPIO safe-state
- From: Rob Herring
- Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: TODO: add an item about GPIO safe-state
- References:
- [PATCH] gpiolib: TODO: add an item about GPIO safe-state
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: TODO: add an item about GPIO safe-state
- From: Linus Walleij
- Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: TODO: add an item about GPIO safe-state
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- [PATCH] gpiolib: TODO: add an item about GPIO safe-state
- Prev by Date: [GIT PULL] pin control fixes for the v6.0 series
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix OOB access in quirk callbacks
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: TODO: add an item about GPIO safe-state
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: TODO: add an item about GPIO safe-state
- Index(es):
 |