Re: [PATCH] gpio: tpmx86: fix uninitialized variable girq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 3:36 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 06:18:42 +0100,
> Dongliang Mu <dzm91@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The commit 924610607f19 ("gpio: tpmx86: Move PM device over to
> > irq domain") adds a dereference of girq that may be uninitialized.
> >
> > Fix this by initializing girq and checking irq before invoking
> > irq_domain_set_pm_device.
> >
> > Fixes: 924610607f19 ("gpio: tpmx86: Move PM device over to irq domain")
> > Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c | 6 ++++--
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> > index fa4bc7481f9a..bdef182c11c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> > @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static int tqmx86_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >       struct tqmx86_gpio_data *gpio;
> >       struct gpio_chip *chip;
> > -     struct gpio_irq_chip *girq;
> > +     struct gpio_irq_chip *girq = NULL;
> >       void __iomem *io_base;
> >       struct resource *res;
> >       int ret, irq;
> > @@ -315,7 +315,9 @@ static int tqmx86_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >               goto out_pm_dis;
> >       }
> >
> > -     irq_domain_set_pm_device(girq->domain, dev);
> > +     if (girq) {
> > +             irq_domain_set_pm_device(girq->domain, dev);
> > +     }
> >
> >       dev_info(dev, "GPIO functionality initialized with %d pins\n",
> >                chip->ngpio);
>
> I wonder if a better fix wouldn't be to directly hoist the
> irq_domain_set_pm_device() call into the 'if (irq > 0)' block.

If irq_domain_set_pm_device has no dependency on
devm_gpiochip_add_data, we can directly move irq_domain_set_pm_device
to the if block.

>
> Thanks,
>
>         M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux