> -----Original Message----- > From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2022 7:15 PM > To: Kumaravel Thiagarajan - I21417 > <Kumaravel.Thiagarajan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; linux- > gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH char-misc-next] misc: microchip: pci1xxxx: use > DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() in place of the SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() in > pci1xxxx's gpio driver > > On 9/12/22 18:36, Kumaravel Thiagarajan wrote: > > build errors listed below and reported for the builds of riscv, s390, > > csky, alpha and loongarch allmodconfig are fixed in this patch. > > > > drivers/misc/mchp_pci1xxxx/mchp_pci1xxxx_gpio.c:311:12: error: > 'pci1xxxx_gpio_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] > > 311 | static int pci1xxxx_gpio_resume(struct device *dev) > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > drivers/misc/mchp_pci1xxxx/mchp_pci1xxxx_gpio.c:295:12: error: > 'pci1xxxx_gpio_suspend' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] > > 295 | static int pci1xxxx_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev) > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > What about this description?: > > "Sudip reported unused function errors on riscv, s390, cksy, alpha, and > loongarch (allmodconfig): > <pci1xxxx_gpio_* errors>... > > Fix these errors by using DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS." It looks good even though it does not include all the details. But is not how much of detail good enough subjective? I thought some might be looking for more information and chose this way. Do you think I need to change this? Please let me know. > > > Fixes: 4ec7ac90ff39 ("misc: microchip: pci1xxxx: Add power management > > functions - suspend & resume handlers.") > > Reported-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Kumaravel Thiagarajan > > <kumaravel.thiagarajan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- . . Thank You. Regards, Kumaravel