On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 09:42:00PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 9:36 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It's unclear why many of static registers were marked as volatile. > > the static (yeah, forgot it) > > > They are pretty much bidirectional and static in a sense that > > written value is kept there until a new write or chip reset. > > Drop those registers from the list to allow them to be cached. > > This patch is not correct due to indexing access. It's sneaked since I > forgot I added it into my main repo. The proper approach should be to > create virtual registers and decode them before use. This allows to > cache all ports and as a benefit to debug print all port actual > statuses. To be clear: With this one removed from the bunch the rest can be applied w.o. any change. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko