On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:36:36 +0200 Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Changes gpio.h DT binding header file to be published under GPLv2 or > BSD-3-Clause license terms. This change allows these GPIO generic You're actually changing to BSD-2-Clause. Your v1 changed to BSD-3-Clause, but following feedback, you change the SPDX code to BSD-2-Clause but forgot to update the commit log. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com
Re: [PATCH v2] dt-binding: gpio: publish binding IDs under dual license
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-binding: gpio: publish binding IDs under dual license
- From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 08:59:29 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20220901163636.3930634-1-etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
- Organization: Bootlin
- References: <20220901163636.3930634-1-etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] dt-binding: gpio: publish binding IDs under dual license
- From: Etienne Carriere
- Re: [PATCH v2] dt-binding: gpio: publish binding IDs under dual license
- References:
- [PATCH v2] dt-binding: gpio: publish binding IDs under dual license
- From: Etienne Carriere
- [PATCH v2] dt-binding: gpio: publish binding IDs under dual license
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-binding: gpio: publish binding IDs under dual license
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 06/11] PCI: aardvark: switch to using devm_gpiod_get_optional()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-binding: gpio: publish binding IDs under dual license
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-binding: gpio: publish binding IDs under dual license
- Index(es):
 |