On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 8:18 AM Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There are no external users of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() anymore, so > let's stop exporting it and mark it as static. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> > --- Applied, thanks! Bart
Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: make fwnode_get_named_gpiod() static
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: make fwnode_get_named_gpiod() static
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2022 22:12:40 +0200
- In-reply-to: <YxRDRx3oubAISIB0@google.com>
- References: <YxRDRx3oubAISIB0@google.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] gpiolib: make fwnode_get_named_gpiod() static
- From: Dmitry Torokhov
- [PATCH] gpiolib: make fwnode_get_named_gpiod() static
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: make fwnode_get_named_gpiod() static
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] gpiolib: remove devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: make fwnode_get_named_gpiod() static
- Next by thread: [brgl:gpio/for-current] BUILD SUCCESS WITH WARNING 6890381720b27a41f2d9e68cce241336342ea3b7
- Index(es):
 |