Re: [PATCH 3/5] gpio: pca953x: Fix pca953x_gpio_set_pull_up_down()

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 4:43 PM Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> A previous fix (dc87f6dd058a gpio: pca953x: Fix pca953x_gpio_set_config)

Format is wrong. Please read documentation on how to refer to the
commits in the tree.

> identified that pinconf_to_config_param() needed to be used to isolate
> the config_param from the pinconf in pca953x_gpio_set_config(). This fix
> however did not consider that this would also be needed in
> pca953x_gpio_set_pull_up_down() to which it passes this config.
>
> Perform a similar call in pca953x_gpio_set_pull_up_down() to isolate the
> configuration parameter there as well, rather than passing it from
> pca953x_gpio_set_config() as the configuration argument may also be needed
> in pca953x_gpio_set_pull_up_down() at a later date.

...

>         u8 pull_en_reg = pca953x_recalc_addr(chip, PCAL953X_PULL_EN, offset);
>         u8 pull_sel_reg = pca953x_recalc_addr(chip, PCAL953X_PULL_SEL, offset);
>         u8 bit = BIT(offset % BANK_SZ);

> +       enum pin_config_param param = pinconf_to_config_param(config);

I would move it up before the u8 variable.

The code looks good otherwise.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for fixing this!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko