On Monday 25 July 2022 22:04:17 Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello Pali, > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 06:09:16PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Saturday 16 July 2022 17:07:51 Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 04:50:19PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > On Saturday 16 July 2022 16:40:28 Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 08:33:27PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > > Armada 38x supports per CPU interrupts for gpios, like Armada XP. Pre-XP > > > > > > variants like Armada 370 do not support per CPU interrupts for gpios. > > > > > > > > > > > > So change compatible string for Armada 38x from "marvell,armada-370-gpio" > > > > > > which indicates pre-XP variant to "marvell,armadaxp-gpio" which indicates > > > > > > XP variant or new. > > > > > > > > > > > > Driver gpio-mvebu.c which handles both pre-XP and XP variants already > > > > > > provides support for per CPU interrupts on XP and newer variants. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Fixes: 7cb2acb3fbae ("ARM: dts: mvebu: Add PWM properties for armada-38x") > > > > > > --- > > > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-38x.dtsi | 4 ++-- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-38x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-38x.dtsi > > > > > > index df3c8d1d8f64..9343de6947b3 100644 > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-38x.dtsi > > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-38x.dtsi > > > > > > @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ > > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > > > > > gpio0: gpio@18100 { > > > > > > - compatible = "marvell,armada-370-gpio", > > > > > > + compatible = "marvell,armadaxp-gpio", > > > > > > "marvell,orion-gpio"; > > > > > > > > > > If you can treat the XP variant as 370 and everything that is supposed > > > > > to work on 370 works then, then maybe the right incarnation is: > > > > > > > > > > compatible = "marvell,armadaxp-gpio", "marvell,armada-370-gpio", "marvell,orion-gpio"; > > > > > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > For pre-XP variants is "marvell,orion-gpio" enough and for XP + post-XP > > > > is needed "marvell,armadaxp-gpio" (with possible "marvell,orion-gpio" > > > > for backward compatibility). > > > > > > > > So I do not see reason why to add "marvell,armada-370-gpio" nor what > > > > value it brings. > > > > > > If you boot an older kernel (i.e. one that doesn't support > > > marvell,armadaxp-gpio, but does support marvell,armada-370-gpio), it > > > > Is there such kernel version? > > Ah, I thought you added "marvell,armadaxp-gpio" with this patch series. > > > > will work better as there are relevant differences between > > > marvell,orion-gpio and marvell,armada-370-gpio. > > > > And if yes, do we really need this in DTS files for new kernel > > versions? I can imagine that such change can be relevant for old LTS > > kernel version, but not for new versions. > > > > > For example some > > > registers seem to have a different offset ... > > > > armada-370-gpio is mapped to MVEBU_GPIO_SOC_VARIANT_ORION, so it will > > get same offsets as orion-gpio. So no change. > > OK, you're right, my assumptions were wrong. I'm convinced your change > is fine now: > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Best regards > Uwe Ok, are there any other objections with this patch series?